**The Work Energy Theorem**

Before illustrating a hidden but oddly obvious flaw, the Work Energy Theorem is first briefly stated
mathematically. There are other methods of
writing it; in all cases, it is the idea that the
work (* Fd*) done to an object is exactly equal
to the change in its kinetic energy

* Fd* cos
θ =

Where

** F** is the amount of force applied

** d** is the displacement

cos is short for cosine (a trig term)

θ is the angle

*m* is the mass of the object

** v** is the object's velocity

** Fd** is the formula for work

*
½ *m**v**^{2 }is the formula for
kinetic energy

**The Unnoticed Flaw**

In short, physicists understand that a form of mechanical energy (work) is defined as a force acting through a displacement. However, when electrical energy is converted into mechanical, the definition / mathematics of "work" actually changes; it becomes a force acting over time.

To convert electrical energy into mechanical energy is rather easy. It can be done using only four things — a 9 volt battery, some magnet wire, a neodymium magnet, and a paper tube just slightly bigger than the magnet. Wind the wire around the tube with 50 turns of wire, and place the magnet inside the tube (see illustration). Once that is done, connect the two ends of the magnet wire to the battery and the magnet will shoot out of one of the tube's ends. Electrical energy has just been converted into mechanical.

A quantity of electrical energy is defined as a function of **voltage**,
**current** and **time**. Electrical utilities know
and use this fact; they typically charge for
electricity by the kilowatt hour (essentially voltage x current x time). This is rather well known amongst electricians,
engineers and physicists. Nothing new in other words but
when you convert electrical energy into mechanical, a fact unknown to
all turns up.

When electrical energy is fed into the solenoid,
a mechanical force is the result. This mechanical force
occurs because the solenoid produces a magnetic field that interacts
with the magnets inside the solenoid. The magnetic force is
the direct result of an applied **voltage** which in turn causes an
electrical **current** to flow. In other words, it takes
both **voltage** and
an **electrical current** to produce magnetic force that
manifests as a mechanical
force. So, when you convert
electrical energy into mechanical (the acceleration of the
neodymium magnets), the amount of mechanical energy is a function of force (**voltage**
x **current**) and time.

Mechanically, work is defined as a force acting through a distance
(displacement in formal terms). Electrically, "work" is defined as
a force (voltage x current) acting over time. This is an
**anomaly** or a **paradox**, if you will, that physics students are never told
about because their
teachers and professors never saw it themselves when they were students.

**Mathematical Example **

Imagine converting a known quantity of electrical energy into mechanical. And to make this very easy to follow, we will use the simplest case possible — accelerating an object from rest. Electrical energy could be configured to provide an average mechanical force of 10 newtons that acts for 1 second. We will use this exact amount of electrical energy twice; first to accelerate a 1 kg object and then then on a 2 kg object.

The equations that apply are
*F=ma*,
*
v=ta*,
and *
ke=½mv ^{2}*.
These are, of course, standard physics formulas; see any standard
textbook.

__The one-kilogram object__

It will accelerate at: a = F ÷ m = 10 ÷ 1= 10 m/s^{2}

Its final velocity will be*:
v = ta = 1 x 10 = 10 *m/s

It experiences a change in Kinetic Energy of: *
½mv ^{2 }
=*

__
The two-kilogram object__

It will accelerate at:
a= F ÷ m = 10 ÷ 2 = 5 m/s^{2}

Its final velocity will be: *v
= ta = 1 x 5 = 5 *m/s

It experiences a change in Kinetic Energy of:
*
½mv ^{2 }
=*

The final values of mechanical energy (50 joules and 25 joules) do not match despite the fact that the exact same amount of electrical energy (10 newtons of force acting for 1 second) was used each time. In terms of the Law of Conservation of Energy, we have either lost or gained 25 joules of energy depending on your particular viewpoint.

**Taking th****e
Mathematics Further **

On seeing the above mathematical example, some might get the idea that Newton's Third Law might play a role. This Law might be thought to explain why there is only an apparent issue and not an actual physics situation requiring further study. Well, let's work this out and we can do so very easily using the calculations just made.

Say that the objects in the above mathematical example are magnets and the mechanism used to accelerate them is a solenoid connected to a battery. And let us further state that the mass of the solenoid and battery is 2 kilograms. When this setup fires the 1 kg magnet, it goes in one direction and the solenoid in the other. The amount of electrical energy used equates to 10 newtons of force acting for 1 second. So in this situation, the solenoid, having a mass of 2 kg, changes its kinetic energy by 25 joules; the 1 kg magnet changes its kinetic energy by 50 joules. In both cases, the solenoid and magnets begin with no kinetic energy since both are initially at rest. The total amount of mechanical energy after the electrical energy is converted to mechanical is the sum of both — 75 joules (25+50).

When this same setup is used to accelerate the 2 kg magnet, that object's kinetic energy changes by 25 joules. The solenoid, also having a mass of 2 kg, also changes its kinetic energy by 25. The total amount of mechanical energy from the battery is the sum of both — 50 joules (25+25).

This is essentially a simplified version of one of the rocketry examples mentioned on the previous page. In other words, if you use identical quantities of chemical or electrical energy and convert that amount of energy into mechanical, the Law of Conservation of Energy does not hold true.

**Moving Forward**

At this point, you should be in one of two places. The first may be the most likely; you do not believe a problem exists. The second place is that you can at least see that there just might be a problem with the Work Energy Theorem. In either case, the best way to move forward is by going backwards. In other words, it is time to examine the history of Momentum and the Work Energy Theorem. Here we will find how and why the physics community accepted both physics principles. And in doing that, we might uncover a few issues providing we actually look.

Click on this link, "History", to see the answers to questions no physics students ask.

NOTE: This website is under construction. There will be more information in the next few days and weeks, all of which can be verified independently and add to the woes of the Work Energy Theorem.

For Comments, Questions, or to report any errors I may have made please email me at SurprisedOwl@gmail.com.